|

To purchase a copy of the book (AUS$48)
contact "mail@melburnebookings.com.au"
click:
Part
1,
Part 2,
Part 3,
Part 4,
Part
5,
Part 2 -
INTRODUCTION
Future Role of
Management
Traditionally, general
management has been associated with the concept of an
hierarchical organisation structure, based on the established
chain of command. Control is exercised through corporate
investment decisions, and the setting of annual budgets.
Accounting, marketing, sales, production, staffing, training,
maintenance and distribution functions are regularly monitored
with the objective of increasing market share, profitability and
safe-guarding of accumulated capital and survival of the
organisation.
In the past, relatively
stable economic conditions provided reliable data for analysis
of business trends and implementation of corrective action.
Management strategies were conservative and tended to avoid
risks. Functional specialisation was high, formal lines of
communication were followed, individuals conformed and were
rewarded in their life-time employment.
Around 40 years ago, the
trend to hand projects to Specialist Managers occurred, which in
turn tended to isolate specific projects from the attention of
direct control of general management. This move towards
specialist attention of a number of high cost, involved projects
led to evolution of Project Management Theory and the training
of Project Managers. It was during this time that computer
programs were developed to assist project managers in applying
specific techniques to monitor/control aspects such as planning,
scheduling, organising, controlling, procurement and reporting.
The amalgamation of
executive management with the unique form of project management
practised today is described by King-Siem (1978) as well suited
to the rapidly changing business environment. Project managers
are readily accustomed to working within tight time frames,
budgetary and other quality assurance control parameters and are
familiar with:
1 Adoption to changing work
situations and unforeseen contingencies;
2 The inevitability of risk taking;
3 Uncertainty and delay;
4 Dependency with other external
organisations;
5 The breaking down of communication
impediments and the need for sharing of ideas;
6 The issue of environmental
awareness and sensitivity in the work place; and
7 Human Relation management skills.
Savory, (1992), in "The
Total Manager" described the role of the modern-day Project
Manager as becoming more relevant to the needs of all managers
of the current business environment, viz;
"In a period of relatively rapid change
all Managers are required to be Project Managers. They are also
required to apply the principles of Quality Management, and to
provide training for their workers to learn the skills of the
new business culture. Regardless of their technical
specialisation, managers are expected to be Total Quality,
Trained Project Managers and must quickly learn to integrate the
technical, quality, training and project tools and techniques
into their managerial styles and methods
(pg. 224).
Changing
Environment
The work environment
today is subject to many changes. Traditional work practices
are changing which means companies need to be more flexible so
as to compete in the market place. Some organisations adopt new
practices (such as Total Quality Management), to change their
existing organisational culture, and start to place more
emphasis upon a customer focus and the need for continuous
improvement.
Total Quality Management
(TQM) is based on the introduction of an environment that
provides a culture and the values where freedom of choice can
flourish, and cross-fertilisation can take place for the mutual
benefit of all team members, and the organisation as a whole.
The elements common to
both Project Management as well as Total Quality Management are
defined by Hubbard (1991:260) as:
Mission; Type
of Process; Acceptable Quality Standards and Consistency;
Performance Measurement; Change Acceptance; Management Style;
Personnel Skills; Career Path; Teamwork; and Reward.
A well developed and
functional TQM system is therefore based on an equally well
defined and Managed Quality System which is in line with the
International ISO 9000 Series, or Australian AS9000 Series of
Quality Standards.
Process Management for
implementation of projects including large Turn-Key type of
project can be documented by a Project Implementation Process.
Project related processes can be shown in a project
implementation flow chart supported by Project Implementation
Procedures, Work Instructions and Forms (see footnote). The
whole project implementation process illustrates and describes
the necessary phases and milestones needed to bring a project to
successful completion by the use of project management
techniques.
To ensure compliance
with ISO 9000, project management philosophy requires a project
to be planned and executed in such manner to guarantee
compliance with quality, cost and delivery imperatives. The
planning, production and verification processes are divided into
several discrete phases.
Where detailed
engineering, hardware and / or software design is required,
procedures for each project process must be shown under separate
heading. The scope of the planning process and definition of
desecrate stages at which review and evaluation will occur
depends upon the type of final product or project being
constructed/manufactured. Similarly the complexity of design,
the extent of product innovation or process technology utilised,
the degree of similarity with past projects and the proposed
duration of the project will need to be considered.
Project Management
(PM) is an organisational strategy which is utilised
to effect a predetermined scope of change. Project management
provides all the technical elements necessary to successfully
launch a project, set clear objectives, provide resources, to
develop work breakdown structures, cost estimating, time
planning and scheduling, control, allocation of resources and
the co-ordination and review, as well as communication,
organisation, training and team motivation. The project manager is
central to a project as its Facilitator, Co-ordinator and
Project Champion.
In comparison, line management within a
strictly functional hierarchy is a position which directs all
processes of a routine or cyclical nature and provides the
ongoing authority and framework for work operations.
Project Management is
commonly concerned with the controlled use of resources (time,
money, materials and equipment) in a competitive environment.
Project success depends upon getting things done on-time, within
budget, to the originally agreed quality parameters or standards
and able to meet the functional objectives with the available
resources. Every project goes through a definitive Life Cycle
which has a specific start, finish and duration.
Management of projects
encompasses a range of techniques including:
Setting objectives and priorities; work break
down structuring (WBS); cost estimating; time/sequence planning
and control; resource allocation and scheduling as well as
co-ordinating and reviewing; communicating; organising; training
and motivating.
Such technical elements
may have different terminology in different cultures but a
synthesis of common purpose and meaning of some of them is as
below:
Objectives and Priorities:
Relate to setting of performance indicators which provide a
target for overall project performance evaluation. Such
performance indicators need to be measurable, relevant and
meaningfully graded according to their priority.
Work Breakdown Structure (WBS):
A formal and systematic way of defining and
identifying of the project unique phases, breaking down of work
for planning, the structuring of and its integration into the
project’s information system. The WBS is a formalised approach
to breaking the project into its practical and logical component
parts.
Cost Estimating and Control:
The project manager is concerned with achievement of financial
objectives, subject to the project’s time, cost and quality
constraints. Budgeting information is integrated into the
planning system, thereby providing data for optimal project
control.
Planning and Time Control:
Monitoring and controlling of the project are fundamental to the
discipline of project management. The aspects of change
management needs to be anticipated and effective stratagems made
available at an early stage, to prevent future problems
arising. Network planning techniques have been developed to
allow orderly arrangement of tasks and the setting of work
priorities and, to simplify management and reporting functions
these include the capacity for sub-optimisation into
sub-projects.
Resource Allocation and Scheduling:
Unlimited manpower, time, plant, space, material and money are
not usually available in practice. Resource allocation
during planning and scheduling is used to ensure resources are
managed in
the most time and cost efficient manner.
Co-ordination:
The project organisation takes place within the framework of the
project’s nominated structure and the project will operate
according to the type of structure and processes that are
specified. By delegating work the project manager is
sharing accountability and responsibility with other members of the team.
Communication:
All parties in the project need to have clear targets and
goals; a communication structure should be established
between suppliers, vendors and the end-user to ensure that they
have the appropriate and timely information for their particular
needs.
Training:Continuous training of the individual project participants
is necessary, it is reviewed during the project’s progress and
at project completion.
[Footnote:]
[Quality Policy is the overall
quality intention of the organisation formally expressed by
executive management;
[Quality Procedures describe
the organisational processes which must be in line with the
policy framework expressed by executive management;]
[Quality Work Instruction
describe the technical structure of the organisation and are
usually Industry Specific;]
[Quality Form are mostly
single page check sheets used to verify adherence to the
specified quality system.]
PART I
The Quality System as a management tool
The prime objective of both the Australian and
International 9000 - Series Quality Standards, is to
provide a structured approach for the Quality Management Process
which one can use to manage an organisation / project
efficiently and to satisfy all stakeholders in the project.
Lowe (1995:82) defines Quality Management as:
“the way all people within an
organisation manage (control) their processes in order to
achieve the desired output, taking into account both the needs
of the company and the needs of the client. The system will
primarily control process through the control of information.
In the first instance the system will ensure that those at the
workforce (those generating the cash flow) are made aware of the
standards of performance which are required of them in order to
achieve a quality output. The standards of performance may be
outlined in plans, schedules and procedures (Information flowing
from management to the workforce)”.
Lowe also refers to a second flow of information from
the workforce and client level to management which is based on
performance measurements and that can be used to continuously
measure client satisfaction. This is a two-way flow of
information where continuous quality improvements flow from this
bi-directional feedback loop.
The
quality of a project or project organisation goes beyond
management of the design process, the process of control and the
delivery of customer service. For the project organisation to
flourish, and continuously improve, there must be an overall
quality management system in place which is often referred to as
Total Quality Management (TQM).
For
such a system to be effective it must be fully documented so
that the unique processes and procedures are not forgotten over
time. If the system is to continue to provide ongoing
efficiency and quality improvement, there need to be a
continuing program of control and monitoring in the form of
audits and reviews. These audits and reviews form the basis for
a well designed TQM system and are a prerequisite for staff and
managerial group training which is needed to create the
organisational environment which facilitates TQM, and allows it
to flourish.
Audits and reviews serve two functions. The first and most
important is that they provide valuable information for
management to identify problem areas and to nominate remedial
action. Secondly, they are the ongoing review activity that
monitors whether work is progressing according to the plan, as
documented. Management reviews are not only an audit process
but are used to maximise the benefits of feedback and
correction. Reviews encompass more than individual improvement
of activities but focus on the entire project’s productivity and
quality performance. The customer benefits most when objective
observations are made through these review processes which look
at:
- Preventative quality aspects such as the cost of
inspection;
- The Quality System running costs;
- Failure costs, both internal and external;
- Customers complaints; and the
- Supplier performance data.
All information gained through these audits and reviews should
be used to establish new policy directives and initiatives which
can be developed to reinforce and maintain the whole
continuous improvement cycle. By incorporating
quality processes into the daily functions within a project, the
efficiency of the product / service being developed will, more
likely, meet the time, cost and quality parameters required.
These functional elements need to be structured so that they can
be understood and applied by all group members. A well
developed Quality Management System will form the basis of a
well run and successful project.
The Quality Management System consists of
policies, procedures , work instructions and supporting forms
which provide a systematic approach for instilling quality
controls into work actions and activities within the business
process. These quality controls within the quality system need
to totally interact and their interrelationships need to be
structured so as to relate as closely as possible to the actual
work to be performed.
Fig. 1 - Relationship between Policies, Procedures
and Work Instructions
Policies and procedures
in a Quality Manual are generally grouped into sections which
document specific intentions and philosophies:
1. The organisational structure of the
company, its departments and projects;
2. The quality management policies,
strategies and responsibilities;
3. A description of process management
activities, such as Sales, Purchasing, Project
Implementation, Service;
4. A description of management support
processes, including documentation control, non-conformance,
standards, cost control, calibration, people, selection and
training;
5. Audit control processes including
internal, external and customer audits; and
6. Human resources, selection and
training.
Project
Implementation
Subjects to be addressed
specifically for development of Project Implementation
Procedures are listed below. These elements can be addressed in
sequence, or according to the way the work is structured within
the organisation.
|
- Tender & Contract
- Suppliers & Subcontractors
- Contract Review
-
Detail Design
-
Risk Management
- Project Brief
- Project Approval
- Site Establishment
- Project Definition
- Signature Authority
- Project Organisation
- Project Planning |
- Procurement & Acceptance
- Monitoring / Updating
- Project Quality plan
- Project Cost Plan
- Training
- Documentation & Distribution
- Contract Variation
- Project Reviews & Reporting
- Project Completion
- Hand Over, Invoicing & Follow Up
- Job Reconciliation.
- Product Support |
When developing
procedures for project implementation some general
organisational topics should also be covered. The following are
a summary of additional topics.
|
- Engineering
- Manufacturing
- Installation / Construction
- Testing and Commissioning
- Logistics (Materials control,
Distribution/Delivery) |
- Equipment calibration &
maintenance
- Non-conformance & corrective
action
- Identification and traceability
- Audits
- Occupational Health & Safety /
Environment |
Turn-Key Project
The managerial process
for a turn-key project may be presented in a flow chart format.
The structure of the Quality Process Flow should be embraced as
policy with each element in the structure described by a Quality
Procedure. Policies and procedures, which form the managerial
process are supported by work instructions and forms detailing
the technical process of the project. The technical process
represented through work instructions and forms are industry
dependent and should be used to describe how to undertake
specific procedures; how to install specific equipment;
component acceptance and final project acceptance, etc. Sample
forms are within the Appendix, Section 5.
Total Quality System
An effective Total Quality Management System is based
on a well integrated audit and review process, embedded in a
culture which embraces motivation, responsibility, authority,
training and team work for staff and management.

Fig: 2 - Total Quality Management System
Model
The question of ‘transferability’ of project
management techniques has always created lively discussions
amongst project managers. One could argue that the technical
processes are indeed industry or product specific, and as such
difficult to transfer.
Managerial processes however are transferable with
the acception of the industry specific part of the Quality
Process System. The implementation of software development
versus hardware development processes as well as turn-key
project processes all require development of specific
implementation flow diagrams. Based on the managerial
processes, reflected in an updated flow diagram, procedures are
written to reflect the industry specific requirements.
An organisation which features a turn-key project department
would require a quality manual specifically aligned to turn-key
project work which can be audited and controlled by that
department. A software development department would match its
quality manual to reflect their software development. In large
organisations each department should develop their own unique
quality procedures manual and the same is true for turn-key
projects.
Establishing department or project specific quality
procedures manuals is in line with modern quality management
philosophy. One quality procedural manual (per large
organisation) will become unmanageable and the staff would find
it difficult to become personally involved in the maintenance of
the quality system through their audit and review process.
The Project Implementation Flow Chart
The implementation flow chart describes the
management requirements for the implementation of Turn -Key
projects. The flow chart covers the 4 phases of Contract
Negotiation, Specification, Development and Support. It
illustrates the basic steps necessary to implement the
contractual obligations according to project procedures. Each
element within the flow chart is represented by an appropriate
procedure as described in the next section of this book.
Contract
Negotiation Phase 0
Specification Phase 1
Development
Phase 2
Support
Phase 3
B DEVELOPING QUALITY SYSTEM POLICIES
This Quality Manual, based on the Australian Standard
AS / NZS3913: 1992 “Quality Manual-Guide to preparation”, was
developed after preparing a Quality Management Systems Manual
for Turn Key Projects. The author endeavoured to cover all
sections of the Australian Standard AS/ISO 9001- 1994.
1.0 GENERAL
The quality manual
details an organisation’s quality management system and includes
the Project Implementation Process policies, procedures and
specific work instructions, and forms.
If corporate policies
have been recorded the policies quoted in the project quality
manual must confirm and support policy statements already made
otherwise both or all manuals will need revision. The contents
of this particular manual is summarised in headings listed in
the overall table of contents below. The titles in the Table of
Contents are divided into sections, from 1.0 to 8.0, and these
should match with those of the Corporate Policy. The titles
should also be referenced using issue numbers and dates in
either the Header / Footer of each page so as to facilitate
accurate updating, tracing and authorisation.
1.1
Table of Contents
|
Section |
Titles |
Issue No. |
Date |
1.0
General
1.1
Table of
contents
1.2
Standard layout
1.3
Authorisation
1.4
Confidentiality
2.0
Quality System Requirements
2.1
Quality manual
purpose
2.2
Relation to other
manuals
2.3
Quality manual
development
2.4
Review and
updating
2.5
Quality Manual
Distribution
2.6
Definition of terms
3.0
Organisational Management
3.1
Department
organisation
3.2
Scope of
operation
3.3
Interfaces
3.4
Responsibility and authority
4.0
Quality Management
4.1
Mission and Quality
policy
4.2
Quality
strategies
4.3
Quality responsibility and authority
4.4
Quality performance measurement
4.5
Quality system
audits
4.6
Management
review
5.0
Management of Processes
5.1
Marketing
5.2
Sales
5.3
Project
implementation
5.4
Design /
Development
5.5
Engineering
5.6
Procurement / purchasing / warehouse
5.7
Site
establishment
5.8
Materials
control
5.9
Manufacturing
5.10
Distribution /
delivery
5.11
Installation /
construction
5.12
Testing /
commissioning
5.13
Customer hand
over
5.14 Job
reconciliation
5.15
Product Support
6.0
Management of Support
Processes
6.1
Documentation
control
6.2
Equipment calibration and maintenance
6.3
Risk
management
6.4
Non-conformance and corrective
action
6.5
Identification and
traceability
6.6
Supplier / subcontractor
evaluation
6.7
Occupational health and safety / Environment
6.8
Standards and
regulations
6.9
Cost control and
invoicing
6.10
Specific
Forms
7.0
Control of Processes
8.0
Human Resources
The above revisions are
authorised for use by:
Name:
Signature:
Date:

Details on revision,
authorisation and updating are provided in section
Review and updating
1.2 Standard Layout
The quality manual
should be prepared electronically to enable easy updating and
printing. It should be accessible for all employees to view the
documents and a Quality Representative needs to be authorised to
control and document all / any changes to it. For practical
purposes, it is usually convenient to keep one controlled hard
copy with the responsible Quality Representative.
1.3 Revision Authority:
Revisions of individual
sections of the quality manual should be signed off by the
authorised person. An updated issue for each section, or the
total manual if necessary, is usually authorised through
initialling or signing of the Table of Contents of the new
update or issue. This process must be followed when releasing
policies, procedures, work instructions or forms.
1.4
Confidentiality
A quality manual usually
contains confidential information or sensitive formulation, or
similar. Therefore copies should not be made of the individual
parts or of the whole of the document except where it may be
necessary for internal use. After management approval
has been given, uncontrolled copies may be provided to customers
or prospective customers when tendering, or to confirm current
contracts or supply agreements.
2.0 QUALITY
SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
It is usually necessary
to document the objectives of the organisation through policies,
procedures, work instructions and forms. The effective
implementation of any Quality System is monitored through use of
audits. The input to the quality manual can be made by staff
members who wish to update any of the existing procedures or
work instructions.
2.1
Quality manual purpose
The purpose of the quality manual is to reflect, through
documentation, the sequence of activities applicable to the
various operations and the major reason for developing a quality manual is to provide
relevant information which can be used to formulate a
continuous improvement strategy.
2.2
Relation to other manuals
Any cross referencing of
quality manuals to other manuals needs to be clearly stated and
referenced so that people know exactly where to look for
specific information. The quality manual would usually be
accessible via the computer network for viewing and copying by
relevant personnel. NB. Only one person within the
department, usually the Department Administrator or the Quality
Representative, should be able to modify and update the manual
(refer to Item 1.2 above). The quality system will also utilise
relevant company standard manuals such as accounting procedures,
Human Resource procedures, etc.
2.3 Quality manual development
The quality manual should be structured such
that it logically describes the flow of operations associated
with the department, and the company. The objective is to allow
ease of access and understanding of policies and procedures by
all personnel. Additionally, the manual should align with all of
the organisation’s other policies and procedures. As an
integral part of continuous improvement the content of the
manual must be subject to regular review.
2.4
Review and updating
Where discrepancies are
found in any documentation, a Document Change Request (DCR)
should be initiated. Access for maintenance and updating of
files should only be available to those specific individuals
nominated by management. Once the change to a specific document
is made its Issue Status must also be updated. Records of
updated quality documents should be archived electronically and
manually.
2.5
Quality Manual Distribution
Distribution of the
quality manual needs to be co-ordinated by the administrator.
One controlled copy should be available in house. Uncontrolled
copies of the quality policies may be included in tender
documents. Management should approve any distribution of the
Quality System information to an external party.
2.6
Definition of terms
All documents need to
include or make reference to a Glossary of Terms and
Abbreviations used. A sample of terms used is given in the
Appendix, Section 6.
3.0
ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURES
A full description of
the corporate structure should be referenced in the Quality
Policy Manual. Divisional or department structures may also be
shown in the divisional or departmental quality manual. It is
now customary to make each department individually responsible
for their own Quality Systems Manual. A quality managers
position may only be needed at senior management level and, all
quality system responsibilities for department activities shall
remain with the department manager and his/her nominated
representative.
The quality
responsibility for a project rests with the project manager and
his/her project team members. Quality representatives report to
their respective departmental head or the project manager.
Organisational working charts which document the functional
roles could also be shown within this part of the quality
manual.
3.1
Department Organisation
This section describes
the area of responsibility within the department. The
description can be in the form of an organisation chart or, as
an individual written description of the role of individuals
working in the department.
3.2
Scope of Operation
This section details
individual department’s responsibilities such as design,
marketing, sales, manufacture, installation. Quality aspects
and the relevant technical support are also installed in this
section. The range of products being handled by the department
may also be listed.
For the benefit of
turn-key activities it should be stated if the department
specialises in this for of project activity. The relevant turn
key activities that may be included are sales, marketing,
planning, design, engineering, supply, installation,
commissioning, maintenance and repair of specific equipment.
These activities may
also be supported by a number of functional groups or other
departments within the organisation as well as specialised 3rd
party sub-contractors, and as such should be documented too.
3.3
Interfaces
In addition to the centralised commercial and
corporate communication aspects, specific other support
functions may also be outlined within the quality policy
manual. These interfaces occuring between Departments should
also be recorded. If projects require involvement of more than
one department the functional interfaces and accountabilities
must be defined in specific project quality plans.
A generic sample of a project quality plan
can be found in the Appendix, Section 4.
3.4
Responsibility and Authority
It is important that each staff member
understands his/her responsibilities and has sufficient
authority to carry out their tasks in an effective manner. This
authority may be delegated according to specifically stated
signature authority guidelines however, instead of individual
job descriptions, responsibilities may be assigned to the
functional work groups. Project specific authority and
responsibility with respect to Project Implementation should be
defined in the Project Quality Plan.
4.0 QUALITY
MANAGEMENT
4.1
Mission and Quality policy
A Quality Management System must support the Mission,
Vision and Values of the Organisation, it needs to emphasise
continuous improvement and the level of service required for all
internal and external customers alike. Customers, are
those people or organisations upon which business or project
activities have an impact. Service is any product, system,
advice or consultancy that may be provided to customers.
Competitive continuous improvement needs to be part of the
Quality Policy. This can be accomplished by ensuring all
employees are satisfied with their working environment. It also
includes legal requirements, and reward systems, career planning
and communication processes. The ability of the organisation to
carry out its objectives and to reach its goals is influenced
strongly by the skills of its employees. It is therefore
necessary to ensure that all employees have the skills to
undertake their work-tasks. The organisation has a need to
ensure that all training effort is geared towards its current
and future workplace needs.
All employees need to be
trained in TQM concepts and its associated techniques and the
working environment should be such that the training concepts
and techniques can be readily translated into real-life action
plans. It is also mandatory that all/any improvements can be
measured to ensure that the organisation’s activities are
relevant and up-to-date. Monitoring of the activity and
performance of all subsidiary companies is also essential. A
good indication of quality performance can be obtained by
monitoring of the level of customer service received by its
external and internal customer. This may take the form of
quantitative measures of elements which are already being
measured internally and might only need confirmation. Measures
could include delivery reliability; regularity of breakdown or
faults; or the frequency of customer complaints.
The gauging of customer
service satisfaction through regular customer interviews should
also be performed as it reinforces the 2-way nature of the
customer quality continuum. Interviews not only help to measure
customer opinion, but they assist in determining whether all
staff understand the nature of their customers needs and any
resultant problems.
4.2
Quality strategies
The organisation’s Quality Strategy should be
clearly spelled out in the form of a policy statement. The
following strategy points should be included;
- Focussing on Quality as a means to continuous
improvement of the organisation’s competitiveness;
- Viewing Quality as the “vehicle” for obtaining
increasing market share;
- Using Quality to project the focus on long-term
planning.
Some examples of the areas that may be
addressed are technical training and quality improvement
training as well as personal growth and improvement. Training
needs to be structured around team activities and working on
recognised quality improvement projects. It should also ensure,
through the use of budget cost centres that all employees gain
an enhanced sense of responsibility and shared ownership for
achievement of cost and quality targets related to their work.
This could be measured through use of regular
audits and managerial review of the quality system. The basis
for a well functioning TQM System is team training, motivation
and dedication through shared exchange and participation,
together with regular audits and reviews of the quality
management system.
4.3
Quality responsibility and authority
In a functional structure the managing
director is ultimately responsible for the overall business
activities and success of the organisation. This defined
responsibility for quality is usually delegated to each
department’s management and staff. Each manager must plan and
document their quality strategy and objectives, based on
guidelines listed in the Corporate Quality Policy Manual. The
department manager must ensure that this strategy is known and
adhered to by his/her employees.
In relation to project work where several
departments may be involved, the project manager takes on
overall quality responsibility with specific assistance from
relevant associated functional groups . The project manager is
charged with achieving agreement about co-ordinated quality
assurance functions, including what measures and monitoring
parameters are to be applied. The project manager may request
assistance from an appointed quality assurance representative.
Within the functional structure each
department may have a QA-representative reporting to a specific
department manager. If a quality assurance department has been
established the quality assurance personnel only need have the
responsibility and authority to ensure that the requirements of
the relevant Quality Assurance Standards are maintained, which
is in line with the Corporate Quality Policy and Manual.
A QA-Representative may have the following
responsibilities:
- Assist the head of the department or project manager in
maintaining an effective QA system;< |